The New Israel Fund (NIF) claims to “protect human rights, champion social justice, and defend democracy... [and to] invest in hundreds of Israeli organizations whose work changes the equation on civil rights, on religious freedom, and on social justice” Sounds great, right?
What about Jewish identity, and the Jewish people’s right to self-determination? How does the NIF stand on those issues?
Jerusalem-based NGO Monitor reports that the
NIF has for many years funded NGOs active in campaigns that portray Israel as a
racist, apartheid state (demonization); undermine Israel’s right to exist (de-legitimization);
accuse Israel of war crimes (lawfare); and promote boycotts, divestment and
sanctions (BDS), aimed at destroying Israel as a Jewish nation. NGO Monitor provides
a list
of about 25 NGOs that are active in these harmful campaigns, and hundreds
of examples of their activities. These NGOs
receive millions of dollars (about 20%) of NIF’s funds, and have done so for
years.
Those NGOs are also funded by European
governments and they collaborate with interests outside Israel in these demonization,
de-legitimization, lawfare and BDS campaigns. The
Observer recently reported that the NIF received funds from a
George-Soros-funded NGO to promote Palestinian-Authority lawfare and BDS. Tower magazine also reports that NIF-funded NGOs “…cooperate with
international partners hostile to Israel... [focussing] primarily on
international audiences …in France, Norway, Netherlands, the UK, and the U.S.” We all have the right to express an opinion about Israeli policies. But only citizens of Israel have the democratic right, at the ballot box, to determine those policies, which will affect their well-being and their safety against daily mortal threats. NIF’s claim of defending democracy rings hollow while it funds NGOs attempting to undemocratically impose the will of foreign interests from outside the nation.
NIF also promotes the notion that Israel’s Jewishness is at odds with its democratic character. Some NIF-funded NGOs advocate for dismantling Israel’s Jewishness, including replacing the flag and the national anthem, and promote the Palestinian “right of return,” which will demographically eliminate Jewish self-determination. One has drafted a constitution that would replace Israel’s Jewishness with a “democratic, bilingual, and multicultural” framework, and has also inserted allegations of Israeli discrimination into the US Black Lives Matter manifesto. Eminent Australian Jewish community leader, Isi Leibler, commented on revelations that an NIF associate director said that “in 100 years, Israel would be majority Arab and that the disappearance of the Jewish state would not be the tragedy that Israelis fear since it would become more democratic...” He suggested that she was in fact, rationalizing NIF funding of groups supporting the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state.
Isi Leibler, also
said
The typical response
of NIF officials to any criticism, and to the abundant evidence of its
anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish activities, is to attack the critics and their
sources. For example, the NIF has run paid advertisements claiming that “NGO
Monitor is a mouthpiece for the extreme right.” In Australia their leaders have
publicly accused critical individuals of "conspiracy theories and
vilification" and "try[ing] to suck the oxygen out of Jewish
life". I’ve been the target of such personal attacks on several occasions,
including one instance in which an NIF Australia leader threatened legal action
in an attempt to silence me.
NIF leaders have
even maligned an entire Jewish community with accusations of "power
structures that silence [young people]", "toxic McCarthyism within
the Jewish community" and "protecting a narrow view of what it means
to be pro-Israel" in an apparent attempt to engineer a mutiny of its
misguided supporters against anyone who criticizes the NIF.
Typically, NIF officials have portrayed a
recent controversy over an NIF-sponsored event in Western Australia as a
communal dispute between “right-wing” and “left-wing”, between “conservative
seniors” and disaffected “progressive” youth, or for/against “settlements”.
This is not just untrue. It’s destructive to attempt to divide our Jewish community,
which includes and welcomes a broad diversity political views, provided they
promote Zionism and Judaism.
The NIF has also accused West Australian Jewish
community newspaper, The Maccabean, of “censorship”, because it declined to
accept an NIF advertisement. The Maccabean is an independent organization
created for the benefit of the Jewish community and can choose with whom it
will do business. I wouldn’t expect it to take advertisements from
organizations opposed to kashrut or brit milah, nor from those
that support BDS or any anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist campaigns. NIF is an
organization that supports both anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish
campaigns, so it’s not surprising that The Maccabean has declined its
advertisement.
So, if you want to protect Jewish
identity, and the Jewish people’s right to self-determination, should you
support the NIF? The answer is a clear: NO. If you care about Zionism and the continuity of Judaism, there are many, much-more constructive ways to promote those values.
Further
reading:
NGO Monitor - New
Israel FundAnalysis of NIF 2015 Funding for 25 Political Advocacy NGOs
Analysis of New Israel Fund (NIF) Funding for Divisive Campaigns
NIF shares Soros’ anti-Zionist agenda, which they hide from their fellow Jews
NIF is Not a Pro-Israel Organization
New Israel Fund (NIF) Has Crossed the Line
NIF Funds Groups Attempting to Erase Israel’s Jewish Framework
NIF Funds Groups Campaigning to Equate Israel with Apartheid
NIF Funds Groups Aiding Goldstone and UN Demonization
NIF Funds Groups Promoting Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions
NIF Funds Groups Helping to Prosecute Israeli Officials Abroad
New Israel Fund Supports Groups that Hurt the Jewish State
NIF "Ethnic Cleansing" Rhetoric in Europe
New Israel Fund's Campaign of Subversion
The New Israel Fund, Dipping Its Toe Into the BDS Swamp
Jewish Groups Outraged at NIF BDS and Delegitimization
NIF’s War on Victims of Terror
Birthright Cuts Ties with NIF
The immense funding campaign behind the anti-Israel NIF
New Israel Fund Can’t Handle Debate
The two faces of the New Israel Fund
Stand Against the New Israel Fund
NIF Opposes Transparency Law
NIF Harms Israel in the UN
Adalah's Misleading Charges of Racism
Questions on Adalah, BDS and Movement for Black Lives Platform
Baladna Arab Youth Association
European-Funded and NIF-Funded NGOs That Promote the Nakba Narrative
Zochrot "Right of Return Event"- EU and NIF Funded Participants
NIF-Funded B'Tselem
B'Tselem - False Gaza War Allegations
NIF-Funded Bimkom
NIF-Funded Breaking the Silence (Shovrim Shtika)
Answers to Questions about Breaking the Silence and the NIF
NIF-Funded Combatants for Peace
NIF-Funded Emek Shave
NIF-Funded Gisha
Gisha's Tunnel Statements in Support of Hamas
HaMoked and B´Tselem´s Torture Allegations
Hamoked Funding
Human Rights Defenders Fund (HRDF)
NIF -Funded Israeli Social TV
NIF-Funded Ir Amim
NIF-Funded Machsom Watch: Political Agenda
Machsom Watch Reports Distorted by Political Bias
NIF-Funded Molad
NIF Funding for Molad: Violation of Guidelines
NIF-Funded Mossawa undermines existence of Israel
NIF -Funded Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality (NCF)
NIF-Funded Nine-Seven-Two (+972) Magazine
NIF-Funded Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI)
NIF-Funded Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHR-I)
Physicians for Human Rights-Israel Gaza Mission
NIF-Funded Rabbis for Human Rights (RHR)
NIF-Funded Parents Circle Families Forum (PCFF)
Behind the facade at Parents Circle
NIF-Funded Sadaka-Reut
NIF-Funded Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity Movement
Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity Movement calls for “liquidation” of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish National Fund
Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity Movement Demonization
NIF-Funded Terrestrial Jerusalem
NIF-Funded Yesh Din
Yesh Din's Israel-bashing at the UN Security Council
Yesh Din's Lawfare Report
Stop the NIF
No comments:
Post a Comment