From JPost, May. 28, 2006 , by TALYA HALKIN ...
A motion to boycott Israeli academics ... has provoked a wave of condemnations from Israeli and British officials and from senior academics and universities in Israel and abroad.
"Around the world this proposal has been rejected as an act of blatant discrimination," said Israel's Ambassador to the UK, Zvi Hefetz. "As a means of promoting dialogue and coexistence in the Middle East, an academic boycott of Israel is counterproductive in the extreme." ..."By pursuing such a policy, NATFHE will isolate its members and their students rather than isolating Israeli academics, who are [in] the forefront of international cooperation on academic study and research, including with Palestinian universities and institutions elsewhere in the Arab world," Hefetz added.
The British Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister Lord Triesman also expressed regret at the boycott vote. "We believe that such academic boycotts are counterproductive and retrograde. Far more can be obtained through dialogue and academic cooperation," he said.
The boycott motion approved by NATFHE will only be effective for three days due to a merger between NATFHE and the Association of University Teachers, a smaller union, which is scheduled to take place on June 1. NATFHE has indicated that the new body will not be bound by the decision.
..."Any attempt to connect politics and academic research is pure McCarthyism," [University of Haifa President Aaron ] Ben-Ze'ev said. "The university will continue working in collaboration with its colleagues in Israel, Britain and elsewhere, in order to protect the principle of academic freedom," he said.
Education Minister Yuli Tamir also expressed strong criticism of the boycott motion, as did Zevulun Orlev, chair of the Knesset's Science and Technology Committee.
"This is a political victory for supporters of a blacklist against Israeli academics," said British academic Dr. David Hirsh, a founder of the ENGAGE Web site, which was created to battle left-wing anti-Semitism.
The Academic Friends of Israel in Britain also released a statement condemning the boycott.
"This only brings dishonour and sheer ridicule upon NATFHE which can be rightly called and remembered as a racist and discriminatory union," the statement said. The organization said it would continue its policy of exposing academics who boycott Israeli institutions and academics, and added that it believed anyone who pursues such an action is guilty of breaking discrimination and equal opportunities laws as well as university rules and their own contracts of employment.
"There are countless Palestinian and Arab collaborations with Israel in agriculture, medicine, science and many other fields, as well as burgeoning links between academics in this country and Israel," said Ronnie Fraser, director of the Academic Friends of Israel. "If the sponsors of this boycotting campaign succeeded in something, it is only to undermine further progress, collaboration and peace in the Middle East and to marginalize the standing of NATFHE, its successor union, the UCU and British academia."
The International Advisory Board for Academic Freedom (IAB) at Bar-Ilan University also expressed its deep dissatisfaction with the boycott decision. IAB Chairman Yosef Yeshurun, provost of Bar-Ilan University, said, "It is unfortunate that NATFHE decided to adopt a negative approach, seeking to burn bridges instead of building them. "The idea of a 'grey boycott' contained within the resolution represents an insidious threat to the world of academia," he said. "Instead of judging academics on merit, academics will be judged according to their nationality and political opinions."
Professor Gerald Steinberg, director of the Interdisciplinary Program on Conflict Management and Negotiation and a member of the IAB executive committee, added that "Such political actions both fuel the Arab-Israeli conflict, and destroy the academic process, since we will no longer be able to trust the objectivity and professional detachment of academics who are involved in 'silent boycotts,' the journals they edit, and the peer review processes in which they participate."
According to the NATFHE conference notes, the union's boycott policy will not bind the new University and College Union that will be created by the June 1 merger of NATFHE and the AUT. Nevertheless, Yeshuron told The Jerusalem Post it was still unclear to the IAB what the status of the boycott decision would be following the merger of the two unions. "There is no need to mourn, because this boycott decision will have no immediate effect," Yeshuron said. "This is a single union and its decision is negligible. Nevertheless, it has symbolic significance and can be problematic in the long term." Yeshurun said it was necessary to continue actively working against such calls for boycott.
"The danger of such a 'grey boycott' is that a faculty member can sever relations with Israeli academics on a personal basis without publicly declaring he was participating in a boycott," Yeshurun said. He added that while pro-boycott activists were a marginal group, the majority of union members were not necessarily aware of the intricacies of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the range of political opinions on Israeli campuses, and could be personally influenced by the boycott decision in the long-term. While senior Israeli scientists would not be hurt by such decisions, he said, the results could be detrimental to young scholars. Yeshurun also said that the IAB would budget funds for collaboration with English academics in order to encourage scientists to work against the boycott.
No comments:
Post a Comment